Canon PIXMA iX6850 This A3 printer, is really a high-quality compact model, created for home hobbyists and small companies instead of busy offices. It's affordable too. The RRP is simply £220 (about US$368, AU$394) and when you buy online, you are able to purchase one for approximately £170 (about US$284, AU$304). This stop by cost is exactly what enables A3 printing to begin departing work and begin making inroads in to the real estate market.
The benefits of having the ability to print at A3 size are obvious. Business users can output large spreadsheets on one page without which makes them they canrrrt read. Photographers can output their images in the bigger size if you don't take these to their local photo lab, and event posters and flyers could be created in your own home instead of a print shop.
Canon PIXMA iX6850 may be the cheaper of these two A3 printers introduced with Canon's 2014 refresh. If you wish to spend a bit more, additionally, there are Canon PIXMA iP8750, which adds features for example direct disk printing, lab-quality photographs along with a sixth ink tank, but at £349 (about US$583, AU$625) RRP, it's considerably more costly.
Neither the iX6850 nor the iP8750 are-in-one, multifunction devices, so pricier to scan or photocopy together. For system needs, Canon PIXMA iX6850 supports for windows XP SP3 or later and Mac OS X 10.6.8 or later.
Even though the A3 inkjet is not as fashionable as A4 models, Canon PIXMA iX6850 continues to be facing some stiff competition. Epson's Stylus Photo 1400 is a touch fundamental, but is extremely affordable for any six-tank photo printer. Canon PIXMA Pro9000 Mark II is fast and produces excellent colour prints, and also the Brother MFC-J6510DW is well-built and includes checking and photocopying features, although it does not stand out in almost any area. For that photo enthusiast, Canon PIXMA Pro-1 provides a 12-ink system to have an incredible colour gamut, but it is heavy, and unsurprisingly, costly. It is good for serious photographers and style professionals, though.
Canon PIXMA iX6800 use 5 Cartridges:
- CLI726 Black
- CLI726 Cyan
- CLI726 Green
- CLI726 Yellow
- PGI725 Black
As pointed out earlier, Canon PIXMA iX6850 is surprisingly compact to have an A3 printer, calculating just 58.4x31x15.9cm and weighing 8.1kg. If you are tight for space, this really is certainly a commendable asset. This is done by shedding the paper tray and taking advantage of a rear sheet feeder because the sole input source. There is no screen with no ports for USB sticks or memory cards, so if you wish to print your photos, you need to transfer these to your pc first. Pricier Duplex either.
Network connectivity is thru 10/100Mbps Ethernet or Wireless 802.11 b/g/n, or hook it up straight to your pc through USB. For mobile printing, Apple AirPrint and Google Cloud Print are catered for, and there is a PIXMA Printing Solutions application for android and ios devices.
Canon PIXMA iX6850 use five individual ink tanks dye-based cyan, green, black and yellow, as well as an additional pigment black for waterproof, high-definition text printing. Standard-sized tanks are, we are told, great for 331 document pages or 127 photos for coloured inks and 1,645 document pages or 384 photos for that black tank. XL tanks can also be found, greater than doubling these figures, and there is also an XXL pigment black cartridge. As A3 printing inevitably uses more ink than A4 documents, high-yield tanks are certainly worth thinking about.
The typical paper types are catered for, including plain paper, photo paper, t-shirt transfers and envelopes. Canon PIXMA iX6850 are designed for plain paper which is between 64 and 105 gsm, and photo paper as high as 300 gsm. The paper input is just great for 150 sheets of plain paper or 20 photo papers, though, which means this is not the perfect printer for top-volume printing.
Like a text printer, Canon PIXMA iX6850 is excellent, with obvious, well-defined text that's readable even at really low point sizes. It's not really vivid as, say, a workplace-orientated HP or Canon's own office printers, however it certainly does not dissatisfy. It's pretty fast too, printing our 20-page, A4 text-only test document in a single minute, 52 seconds.
But naturally, it's its picture quality that's on most interest. Printing an A3 flyer on plain paper, the outcomes were excellent. Text was obvious and well defined, colours were accurate there was hardly any speckling with no banding whatsoever. Canon PIXMA iX6850 is fantastic for window posters and internal presentations, or indeed anything lacking pro-quality publishing. A photograph test image on A3 plain paper was less impressive. The shades were good, however it demonstrated definite indications of banding, especially around the colour ramps.
But in which the Canon PIXMA iX6850 really shone is at high-quality prints on photo paper. Definition was superb, with skin color being especially impressive. Even large regions of gradated colour demonstrated no indications of banding whatsoever. Possibly these were just a little more dark than was ideal, but overall, these were great. Speeds were reasonable, having a high-quality A4 photo print taking two minutes, 18 seconds, and also the same print in A3 taking three minutes, 56 seconds. Not quite lab speeds, but entirely appropriate for the house.
Despite a couple of compromises, Canon PIXMA iX6850 excels in the tasks it's meant for. It's most likely not ideal as the only printer, and could not replace your overall everyday workhorse. But it is great like a companion for your primary inkjet or laser printer, for big-format printing photos, and economical enough for use in this manner too. If you have shied from switching from your inkjet to some laser since you still wish to top printing quality photos, most likely the PIXMA iX6850 may be the excuse you'll need?
Formerly, A3-capable printers happen to be too bulky and too costly to create any great inroads in to the real estate market, however the new Canon PIXMA iX6850 is both affordable little - or at best as compact being an A3 printer could be. But despite being excellent in the tasks it had been created for, we do not think it is a perfect substitute for the current A4 printer, particularly if this is an all-in-one device.